The core of Amazon Neptune is a purpose-built, high-performance graph database engine optimized for storing billions of relationships and querying the. Available in all major providers. Experts from AWS and Neo4j explore four types of databases and the most common applications for each: relational, document, in. Reviewers felt that Amazon Neptune meets the needs of their business better than. Neo4j Enterprise Edition can be easily deployed on Virtual Machines in Google Cloud Platform (GCP) by using the official listing for Neo4j Enterprise on the GCP Marketplace. Neo4j Aura: Neo4j’s fully managed cloud service: The zero-admin, always-on graph database for cloud developers. Amazon Neptune vs. Fast, reliable graph database built for the cloud. A statement can assert the existence. The same AWS Neptune Open Cypher queries are much slower than Neo4j Cypher queries (about 7-10 times slower). MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3. System Properties Comparison Amazon Neptune vs. The same AWS Neptune OpenCypher queries are much slower than AuraDB Cypher queries (about 7-10 times slower). Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs. openCypher is a declarative query language for property graphs that was originally developed by Neo4j, then open-sourced in 2015, and contributed to the openCypher project under an Apache 2 open-source license. Amazon Neptune. If the upgrade or migration is not successful, you have to do a full rollback, including restoring a pre-upgrade or a pre-migration backup. Our visitors often compare Amazon Neptune and MarkLogic with. Bolt is a statement-oriented client/server protocol initially developed by Neo4j and licensed under the Creative Commons 3. Bolt inherits its core type system from PackStream, over which its messages are generally carried. Cypher provides an intuitive way to work with property graphs today and is the best on-ramp to the graph query language (GQL) standard being developed by ISO . intermix browser and visitor info. By doing so, if a node N is for example a start node for 5 relationships of type A and for 5 million rels of type B, traversing rels of type A for N remains O(n=5). Neo4j using this comparison chart. Knowledge graphs stored in Neo4j can be used with SageMaker to. Our visitors often compare Amazon Neptune and Memgraph with Neo4j, ArangoDB and TigerGraph. GraphDB vs. Amazon Neptune vs Neo4j AuraDB. 8xlarge (32 vCPUs and 244 GiB of RAM), giving Neptune a 16x dynamic range for writes and a 256x dynamic. 1 (and its newly introduced dense node management), nodes' relationships are segregated by type. OrientDB. The AWS Neptune graph database is designed to store a wide collection of complex relationships as a scalable service. Neo4j vs. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Nebula Graph internally uses the Key-Value store RocksDB for. On the Options page, choose Next. So long as your existing queries and connection methods work on both platforms (without any modification), you could potentially leverage these two methods to have very minimal. Downgrades. how Neo4j stores data? From this post, it says Neo4j stores each node with a direct link to its connected nodes, ". Neo4j using this comparison chart. It is different from Mysql or MongoDB as it has its features that makes it special compared to other Database Management System. Scalable, ACID-compliant graph database designed with a high-performance distributed cluster architecture, available in self-hosted and cloud offerings. Neo4j has also since come out with their Aura service which takes care of the DBA argument that people use. It is worth pointing out that. SQErzo intermediates between the graph database and your application logic in a database agnostic way. On the Review page, select the first check box to acknowledge that AWS CloudFormation will create IAM resources. neo4j. "Cypher – graph query language" is the primary reason why developers choose Neo4j. Amazon Neptune vs. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Amazon Neptune easier to use and administer. Amazon Neptune is in-scope for PCI DSS, ISO compliance, and SOC 1, 2, and 3 compliance. from Neo4J; AWS Neptune is also designed like other Amazon databases to. Amazon Redshift vs Neo4j Graph Database. Please select another system to include it in the comparison. r4. It is. It is an open source NoSQL database management system written in Java. exclude from comparison. Stardog X. Neo4j GraphQL Library. Two blog posts that you may want to review include both an initial baseline migration [1] and how to capture changes and perform incremental updates [2]. The Neo4j graph database is part of a larger ecosystem on AWS. System Properties Comparison Amazon Neptune vs. Neo4j Internal Data Storage What is the difference between how AWS Neptune stores data internally vs. exclude from comparison. Click to. 2/5 stars with 6 reviews. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Amazon Neptune X. The winner in this exercise is Neo4J, off-the-shelf, offered by Google Cloud. how Neo4j stores data? From this post, it says Neo4j stores each node with a direct link to its connected nodes, ". Whereas the Neo4j database is fully feature, high maintenance, and free database. These are lower level operations. Amazon Neptune is a fully managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. ArangoDB Cloud –The Managed Cloud Service of ArangoDB. While there are various graph databases available today like Neo4j, Amazon Neptune, Tiger graph, etc but neo4j is one of the oldest and leading providers in the space and also has features specific to Data Science applications. Global database clusters consists of a primary write DB cluster in one region, and up to five secondary read DB. Our visitors often compare Neo4j and TigerGraph with Amazon Neptune, ArangoDB and GraphDB. In API Gateway, we add a document-recommendations resource and a {user} and {document} GET method. r5. 5 stars with 112 reviews. Amazon Neptune X. Reviewers agreed that both vendors make it equally easy to do business overall. Neo4j has a rating of 4. At AWS, we believe that open source is good for everyone and we. 1. Compare Amazon Neptune vs. Fifty pages of documentation, to learn how to deploy the additional AWS services to visualize your AWS. Fast, reliable graph database built for the cloud. Neptune compatibility with Neo4j. The NoSQL database uses mathematical graph theory to. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best fit for your. Neo4j Aura: Neo4j’s fully managed cloud service: The zero-admin, always-on graph database for cloud developers. It can store. AWS Lambda, on the other hand, is designed to support relatively short-lived and stateless executions. Part 1: TigerGraph, Neo4j, Amazon Neptune Oooh. Also, we tried to rewrite the queries to Gremlin and test performance but it is still very slow. com. fully-managed cloud-based high-performance graph database that is available on AWS. Scalable graph database built for online analytics and data harmonization with MPP scaling, high-performance analytical algorithms and reasoning, and virtualization. 4/5 stars with 40 reviews. Based on verified reviews from real users in the Cloud Database Management Systems market. 数十億のリレーションシップの保存とミリ秒台のレイテンシーでのグラフのクエリに最適化された. TigerGraph in 2023 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. AWS Neptune vs. Changed data from the Kafka stream can then be copied to the Neptune cluster using an architecture similar to the one described in Writing to Amazon Neptune from Amazon Kinesis Data Streams. I've noticed a few things that seem concerning, regarding security of Neptune. large with 2 CPUs and 16GiB RAM. Neo4j need different channels for writing than for read. Claim Neo4j and update features and information. Please select another system to include it in the comparison. One of the most popular document stores available both as a fully managed cloud service and for deployment on self-managed infrastructure. It is a Triple Store vs Neo4j being a Label Property Graph. Neo4j vs. Neo4j can be used in conjunction with SageMaker to engineer novel features that improve the accuracy of SageMaker models. Memgraph. Our visitors often compare Amazon DocumentDB and Amazon Neptune with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB, Amazon Aurora and Amazon DynamoDB. The data is replicated automatically across the availability zones regardless of. Compare Amazon Neptune vs. Apache Jena - TDB. 0 Attribution-ShareAlike license. 1 Answer. Swagger using this comparison chart. 1. Click to enlarge. It is a Triple Store vs Neo4j being a Label Property Graph. The top reviewer of Amazon Neptune writes "Useful pattern identification, price well, and straightforward implementation". Listen in as Todd Escalona of AWS talks with Marc Wangenheim, Senior Engineering Manager at Nike, about how the company powers a. . Several tools, web-based and command line, allow easy migration of your Neo4j databases to AuraDB. As we can see that Neo4j is totally winning, after the 2017 rise of Cosmos DB Azure’s Graph Database and Neptune AWS’s Graph Database Amazon Grew although Cayley Google’s Graph Database is. Neo4j Aura: Neo4j’s fully managed cloud service: The zero-admin, always-on graph database for cloud developers. Name. The choices made have minimal effect on graph data interoperability, and this topic is not commonly discussed among those constructing property graphs. Neptune VM instance sizes range from db. all creates a single CSV file containing data for all nodes and relationships. Neo4j: Neo4j is a native graph database with its own storage and query engine. Neo4j vs. exclude from comparison. t4g. What’s the difference between Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Neptune, Neo4j, and Ninox? Compare Amazon DynamoDB vs. See this. That is one of the reasons why we are moving to AWS. Windows: Open the hosts file as an Administrator (C:WindowsSystem32driversetchosts) MacOS: Open Terminal and type in the command: sudo nano /etc/hosts. Data Loading Speed: TigerGraph loads 21x to 31. The high-performance distributed cluster architecture of Neo4j enables customers to run the most challenging OLTP and data science workloads, while preserving ACID compliance and data integrity. It supports also SQL JDBC access to Knowledge Graph and GraphQL over SPARQL. Cypher was developed by Neo4j® . A command-line utility for migrating data to Neptune from Neo4j. . exclude from comparison. GraphDB. Some of the features offered by GrapheneDB are: Cloud scaling. Please select another system to include it in the comparison. Amazon Neptune is ranked 4th in Managed NoSQL Databases with 1 review while Neo4j AuraDB is ranked 8th in Managed NoSQL Databases. r5. Description. AuraDB provides seamless connectivity to services on AWS to expand your reach, compute power, and delivery. Considering alternatives to Amazon Neptune? See what Cloud Database Management Systems Amazon Neptune users also considered in their purchasing decision. Neo4j X. AWS Neptune is also a different graph storage model. With Neptune ML, you can improve the accuracy of most predictions for graphs by over 50%. Please select another system to include it in the comparison. ArangoDB vs. With AuraDB, can deploy database close to the. For more information about automating point-in-time graph data migration from Neo4j to Neptune, see Migrating a Neo4j graph database to Amazon Neptune with a fully automated utility. I've seen tools for neo4j, but i have a lot of experience with SPARQL and would prefer that. We have programs that support you on your startup journey, as well as educational tools and training for your students. Neo4j - The world’s leading Graph Database. Customers can use the openCypher and Gremlin query languages together over the same property graph data. Hot Network Questions Can a typical tankless water heater be set to very low temperatures like 70°F/20°C? American odds to probabilities Sanding down or staining floor tiles possible to alter design?. See all alternatives. Graph DBMS. Neo4j vs. I've used AWS Neptune. Description. Neo4j has a far bigger user base because of its open source code and self hosting feature, so even if the content online is little, without even knowing myself I can assure you it's far more than anything AWS hosted. Description. Databricks X. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. exclude from comparison. An open source graph database built for real-time streaming and compatible with Neo4j. g. r4. Claim OrientDB and update features and information. large with 2 CPUs and 16GiB RAM. Modify your hosts file to map localhost to your Neptune endpoint. 4 branch: Compare GraphDB and Neo4j Graph Database. The Neo4j database is provided open-source software,. An AWS Lambda function runs in an execution context which isolates the function from other functions. The TigerGraph benchmark covers the following: Data loading time; Storage size of loaded data; Query response time for k-hop neighborhood count Neo4j auradb enterprise on aws , any low cost options available to start with limited resources (currently $70K+ it is showing in contract). Graph DBMS. Our complete benchmark series is open source. The basic unit of Amazon Neptune graph data is a four-position (quad) element, which is similar to a Resource Description Framework (RDF) quad. I'm working with Gremlin and AWS Neptune graph database. Amazon Neptune X. September 1, 2021 |25min read AWS Neptune, Neo4J, ArangoDB or RedisGraph: How We Chose our Graph Database Nir Amara Graph databases are a kind of database that. AWS-Announces-Amazon-Neptune-Serverless 26 October 2022, Amazon Press Release. Fast, reliable graph database built for the cloud. AWSの公式ドキュメントによれば、. Neo4j Please select another system to include it in the comparison. Neo4j vs. Some of the features offered by. exclude from comparison. Scalable, ACID-compliant graph database designed with a high-performance distributed cluster architecture, available in self-hosted and cloud offerings. Amazon Neptune is a fully managed database service built for the cloud that makes it easier to build and run graph applications. how Neo4j stores data? From this post, it says Neo4j stores each node with a direct link to its connected nodes, ". Primary database model. The default branch for this repository is dev, which contains changes for the next release. A scalable, speed-optimized, distributed graph database. Boost is a library, not a database, so anything around persistence and management would fall on the application to manage. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions; RedisGraph: A High. Our visitors often compare Neo4j and TinkerGraph with JanusGraph, SurrealDB and Amazon Neptune. Another way to work with TinkerPop is to use Amazon Neptune, a fully managed graph database service from AWS. What’s the difference between Amazon Neptune, ArangoDB, Neo4j, and ScyllaDB? Compare Amazon Neptune vs. System Properties Comparison Amazon Neptune vs. Neo4j is backed by Neo Technology, and is regarded as the front-runner in the Graph DB community (score of 38. As you have observed you could store a graph using adjacency lists as in your example. The core of Amazon Neptune is a purpose-built, high-performance graph database engine optimized for storing billions of relationships and querying the graph with milliseconds latency. In the AuraDB UI, simply upload local Neo4j . Instead I have just the raw csv file where each row is a record (e. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Amazon Redshift easier to use and administer. Description. Connect with an AWS IQ expert. MongoDB X. Neo4j Aura: Neo4j’s fully managed cloud service: The zero-admin, always-on graph database for cloud developers. Neo4j works with a variety of AWS services, plugging into your existing architecture. ScyllaDB in 2022 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Loading data into Amazon Neptune can be done via the supported query languages or via the Neptune bulk load API. exclude from comparison. This mismatch in design philosophy can lead to some unexpected issues when using Lambda to query Neptune. 今回は Amazon Neptune と Neo4j の性能検証をしてみました。. Querying a Neptune Graph. Typical use cases for a graph database include social networking, recommendation engines, fraud detection, and knowledge graphs. Multi-availability zones high availability, asynchronous replication for up to 15 read replicas within a single region. AWS Neptune vs. TigerGraph has a rating of 4. Reviewers felt that Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) meets the needs of their business. Dgraph System Properties Comparison Amazon Neptune vs. These procedures support entity extraction, key phrase extraction, sentiment analysis, and document classification. What’s the difference between Amazon Neptune, ArangoDB, Nebula Graph, and Neo4j? Compare Amazon Neptune vs. System Properties Comparison Amazon DocumentDB vs. For the limitations and differences in Neptune support of. However, reviewers preferred the ease of set up with Neo4j Graph Database, along with administration. You can manage as many projects and database servers locally as you like and also connect to remote Neo4j servers. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT. Load it into a Neptune DB cluster using Neptune Bulk Loader. Briefly about ArangoDB. APOC NLP. The openCypher language is a declarative query language for property graphs that was originally developed by Neo4j, then open-sourced in 2015, and contributed to the openCypher project under an Apache 2 open-source license. Primary database model. Description. However, we are interested in the features and capabilities that people would like to see provided. If your organization has never created an Amazon Neptune cluster until April 20, 2022 or later, you are eligible to use 750 hours of the Neptune db. 💡 Welcome to the Monorepo for Neo4j + GraphQL. For large scale, mission-critical applications that require advanced security and 24x7 support. The Neo4j CloudFormation template repository contains code for Neo4j 5 on the main branch and code for Neo4j 4. Amazon Neptune Now Supports Serverless Deployment Option 1 November 2022, InfoQ. What’s the difference between Amazon Neptune, Neo4j, and TigerGraph? Compare Amazon Neptune vs. Neo4j vs. Neo4j X. Backups. Support for openCypher is compatible with the Bolt. While most databases are providing a single option, for instance, Neo4j is a graph database type only, ArangoDB is a swiss multitool in this field. Neo4j AuraDB is a highly advanced graph database that has revolutionized the way applications are developed and managed. Nebula Graph vs. TinkerGraph. Neo4j does not support downgrades. Neo4j: The world’s leading Graph Database. TigerGraph is also capable of completing a six-hops path query. 0. Neo4j vs. It helps to automate the processes of monitoring workload and adjusting capacity for your Neptune database. Enterprise-ready RDF and graph database with efficient reasoning, cluster and external index synchronization support. Amazon Neptune X. See Accessing a Neptune graph with Gremlin to learn about using. If my assumption is wrong, then Neptune+DynamoDB is probably the best solution. ArangoDB vs. Neo4j vs. You can benefit from the service’s purpose-built, high-performance, fast, scalable, and reliable graph database engine when you migrate data from your existing self-managed graph databases, such as Neo4j. exclude from comparison. Bolt is an application protocol for the execution of database queries via a database query language, such as Cypher . For more information on the available store formats per Neo4j version, see Operations Manual → Display store information. 1. What’s the difference between Amazon Neptune, Neo4j, Redis, and TigerGraph? Compare Amazon Neptune vs. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best. Available on AWS, Azure and Heroku. Neo4j vs. Amazon Neptune X. Open Graph APIs. js, Python, Ruby, Go. As the inventors of the property graph, Neo4j is the first and dominant mover in the graph market. It uses N-Quads. 数十億のリレーションシップの保存とミリ秒台のレイテンシーでのグラフのクエリに最適化された. The same AWS Neptune OpenCypher queries are much slower than AuraDB Cypher queries (about 7-10 times slower). Fast, reliable graph database built for the cloud. Add replicas for various use cases, and then use specific instance endpoints with specific micro services. exclude from comparison. The loader can load from multiple vertex files and multiple edge files in a single load job. Nebula Graph vs. AWS CloudFormation is a declarative Infrastructure as Code (IaC) language that is based on YAML and instructs AWS to deploy a set of cloud resources. Say good-bye to property and labels that we all enjoy in Neo4j and be prepared for many many many more relationships to nodes to store the properties that used to be on a single node. 7M nodes and 11. Amazon Neptune : ArangoDB : Cassandra : Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB : Neo4j : Description: Fast, reliable graph database built for the cloud: Native multi-model DBMS for graph, document, key/value and search. Aaah. Stack Overflow | The World’s Largest Online Community for DevelopersAvailable on AWS and Google Cloud in over 45 global cloud regions, deploy AuraDB in close proximity with your application in the region of your choice¹. Gremlin query in AWS Neptune visualized by Gremlin UI. Each product's score is calculated with real-time data from verified user reviews, to help you make the best choice between these two options. A developer provides a link to a detailed overview of the storage format and a video series of the graph query engine and optimizer of AWS Neptune. InfiniteGraph vs. Amazon Aurora X. There are of course many ways to model and store connected data. If you are migrating current Neo4j Cypher code to Neptune, see Neptune compatibility with Neo4j and Rewriting Cypher queries to run in openCypher on Neptune for help. $ cd react-amplify-neptune-workshop $ npm start. comStack Overflow | The World’s Largest Online Community for DevelopersSystem Properties Comparison Neo4j vs. Rewriting Cypher queries to run in openCypher on Neptune. The way I have done it is to define a schema using AWS AppSync and to have AppSync call Lambda resolvers that use Gremlin Python. After you have migrated your data from Neo4j to Neptune, the next step is to migrate the application itself. Share. On the other hand, Neo4j provides the following key features: intuitive, using a graph model for data representation. JanusGraph. Amazon Neptune is ranked 4th in Managed NoSQL Databases with 1 review while Neo4j AuraDB is ranked 8th in Managed NoSQL Databases. Naming Convention in Neo4j is very clear: Node (Vertex): UpperCamelCase (Pascal case) Relation (Edge) : UPPER_CASE. With Amazon Neptune, you can scale the compute and memory resources powering your production graph cluster up or down by creating new replica instances of the desired size, or by removing instances. Share this page Detailed side-by-side view of Amazon Neptune and Neo4j and TigerGraphopenCypher is a declarative query language for property graphs that was originally developed by Neo4j, then open-sourced in 2015, and contributed to the openCypher project under an Apache 2 open-source license. Knowledge Graphs, by definition, store and process billions or even trillions of datasets. For customers using RDF and SPARQL with Neptune, the World Wide Web Consortium's SPARQL 1. . This will show you the amount of data that has been uploaded to your database. Large scale data warehouse service for use with business intelligence tools. Enterprise-ready RDF and graph database with efficient reasoning, cluster and external index synchronization support. It was designed specifically to maintain various types of NoSQL databases. Neo4j Aura: Neo4j’s fully managed cloud service: The zero-admin, always-on graph database for cloud developers. However, reviewers felt that the products are equally easy to set up. An open source graph database built for real-time streaming and compatible with Neo4j. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. based on preference data from user reviews. Neo4j/Neptune/etc vs Oracle DB's graph capabilities. Neo4j in 2023 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. Like Neptune, Neo4j was also originally intended to be used for OLTP, but added an analytic query library in. 6x faster than Neptune r4. System Properties Comparison Neo4j vs. We have node and lookup indexes on AuraDB but we can't create them on AWS Neptune. System Properties Comparison Amazon Neptune vs. Amazon Redshift X. Hope it could be support for bolt driver + neo4j example. Neo4j. Amazon Neptune is a fully managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. Vector Database Market worth $4. Can someone help me by adding your suggestions and guidance on this. It's free to sign up and bid on jobs. It is a transactional database that can support thousands of concurrent users executing complex graph traversals in real time. Neptuneはフルマネージドなグラフデータベースサービスです。. For small development projects, learning, experimentation and prototyping. PHEMI Health DataLab vs. Nebula Graph vs. Graph DBMS. Database Model. Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed. html; If there is a difference in choosing filesystem for HDD vs SSD, please mention your thoughts on both. reliable, with full ACID transactions. Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected data sets. Under Metrics you can select Neptune and search for the MetricName='VolumeBytesUsed'. ScyllaDB in 2023 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Neo4j uses the language Cypher, which it originally developed. To load Apache TinkerPop Gremlin data using the CSV format, you must specify the vertices and the edges in separate files. and after exporting it loaded same data into AWS Neptune. Globally distributed, horizontally scalable, multi-model database service. MySQL and PostgreSQL compatible cloud service by Amazon. The AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) is a framework that provides an automated and repeatable way of handling cloud infrastructure. Primary database model. The Neptune database is a fault-tolerance, self-healing, fast and reliable database. Description. . 0. When we launched Neptune, we made a decision to support leading graph models and frameworks. In the warm-up phase, query mixesareposedtothetriplestore. MongoDB X. 4 on the Neo4j-4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB writes "It's easy to setup and the support is. Neo4j in 2023 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Neo4j Aura: Neo4j’s fully managed cloud service: The zero-admin, always-on graph database for cloud developers. Learn how to use the AWS CDK to build an AWS Lambda function in Java that connects to Neo4j. Amazon Neptune X. Neo4j using this comparison chart. 30 July 2021, ZDNetMongoDB belongs to "Databases" category of the tech stack, while Neo4j can be primarily classified under "Graph Databases". Amazon Neptune is an OLTP-focused open-specifications graph database where the architecture. 2. MySQL and PostgreSQL compatible cloud service by Amazon. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Neo4j Graph Database overall. exclude from comparison. 4/5 stars with 40 reviews. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is an easy-to-use service for deploying and scaling web applications and services developed with Java, . Some of the features offered by Azure Cosmos DB are:DBMS > Amazon Neptune vs.